User talk:Riverpa

Re: Balticon

That kind of data is not encyclopedic and doesn't belong in an article about a given SF con. There are a lot of mundanes out there who would love to see all fandom-related articles deleted; the last thing we need to do is to provide fodder for their arguments by padding articles with trivial detail about what's on the program at a given con (which changes every year anyway. (When was the last con you went to that had a banquet, once a fixture of convention programming?) Concentrate on providing evidence (preferably from the mundane press, or at least sources known to mundanes like Locus) to prove notability. --Orange Mike | Talk 16:34, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article needs more substantial, encyclopedic content. Examples would be information derived from articles in reliable sources explaining its history (putting it into a context as part of the history of SF and fandom, etc.) or stating what role Balticon plays in SF culture in the Mid-Atlantic states. This is a reference work, not a con-goer's directory. Look at Google Books, Google Scholar, Google News, etc. for relevant information. --Orange Mike | Talk 17:19, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I won't remove it myself, at least at this time, but the photo of the Klingons has to go for the same reasons Mike cited above. Yes, costuming is part of Balticon but often when I mention science fiction conventions I quickly add the sort of thing I have on my Wikipedia page: "Please note that SF conventions aren't about groupies, people in Spock ears, or most of the stereotypes."

A quick search for images comes up with David Louis Edelman's Balticon Dealers Room and I'm certain he'll give me permission to use it. The one disadvantage is that it makes Balticon look as if it's all about books, which it isn't. So another, and perhaps best, option would be the cover of one of the program books. I'm not going to do your research on that for you. --Kovar (talk) 19:47, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

David Standish Ball

I understand; uncited claims in biographies should be tagged or removed. Yes, I've heard the jokes about Canon Ball. Bearian (talk) 18:47, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sites is available for free on Medscape via this link. It requires a subscription, but the subscription is free.

Also, please clarify regarding the monograph. Having read it several times, I still fail to see any substantial implications for the page, and little that could not be better-sourced to a peer-reviewed article. WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules:^simple/_complex 20:52, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mediation at Bioidentical hormone replacement therapy

Hello, I have decided to offer my help with the mediation request for this article. If you are still interested in participating in mediation, please let me know. My goal with informal mediation is to try to clarify the exact issues that are in dispute, then to see if it is possible to come to a compromise that everyone agrees upon. Thank you. -- Atama頭 20:35, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Biased Anti-Bioidentical Hormone Therapy Page

Problems with Bioidentical Hormone Therapy Page

I quite agree with you that this page reveals a biased narrow anti-bioidentical opinion which mirrors interests and reflects the consensus of the synthetic drug industry. As such, the page, as written, is an embarassment to the concept of neutrality espoused by wikipedia. Readers are educated and see through it. If you are interested in developing concensus on this please, contact me. I think the timing is good for a major change.

UGAcodon (talk) 00:18, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited World Fantasy Convention, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Arlington and Alan Lee (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Peggy Rae

Hi Riverpa
I noticed Michael Walsh has a Wiki page, so I linked it on the World Fantasy Convention wiki page. Peggy Rae, however, has no page of her own.
She is mentioned in 10 wiki articles, both as Pavlat and Sapienza. I don't know her history well enough to write a page for her, so I thought you might wish to shop the idea around. :-)
Mike Cptmrmcmillan (talk) 10:14, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I like the article very much. Thank you for putting it together. "Peggy Rae Sapienza, (born McBride," probably needs fixin' ;-) Cptmrmcmillan (talk) 03:40, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Cptmrmcmillan (talk) 22:38, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Riverpa. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Riverpa. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Riverpa. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Peggy Rae Sapienza for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Peggy Rae Sapienza, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peggy Rae Sapienza until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:05, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Greg Rutkowski

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Greg Rutkowski requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Mccapra (talk) 07:10, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Greg Rutkowski moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Greg Rutkowski. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. TartarTorte 13:57, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Greg Rutkowski

Hello, Riverpa. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Greg Rutkowski, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Greg Rutkowski

Hello, Riverpa. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Greg Rutkowski".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:27, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]